<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.livejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Pee Aich Dee</title>
  <link>http://trickybrains.livejournal.com/</link>
  <description>Pee Aich Dee - LiveJournal.com</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:32:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com</generator>
  <lj:journal>trickybrains</lj:journal>
  <lj:journalid>14319485</lj:journalid>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  <atom10:link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/' />
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://trickybrains.livejournal.com/1606.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:32:39 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>cool tools</title>
  <link>http://trickybrains.livejournal.com/1606.html</link>
  <description>The past few days, I&apos;d been thinking that maybe you could group words into semantic categories based on the syntactic contexts . . . something exactly like &lt;a class=&quot;snap_shots&quot; href=&quot;http://demo.patrickpantel.com/Content/LexSem/cbc.htm&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a class=&quot;snap_shots&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/%7Elindek/demos.htm&quot;&gt;Prof. Dekang Lin&lt;/a&gt; and his former student &lt;a class=&quot;snap_shots&quot; href=&quot;http://demo.patrickpantel.com/&quot;&gt;Prof. Patrick Pantel&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s websites have some pretty useful tools for retrieving semantic relationships learned from text.&amp;nbsp; Don&apos;t know how I haven&apos;t come across this before.&amp;nbsp; Here&apos;s the &lt;a class=&quot;snap_shots&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/%7Elindek/papers/kdd02.pdf&quot;&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&apos;s something I should have come across by now, but better late than never.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&apos;ve also been reading a couple of books lately: &lt;i&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;snap_shots&quot; href=&quot;http://books.google.ca/books?id=c1QGZYwpEdwC&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=Fuzzy+Grammar&amp;amp;sig=48UCZUoDJuqJ5jL9dh_tcg7Tfj8&quot;&gt;Fuzzy Grammar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;a class=&quot;snap_shots&quot; href=&quot;http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&amp;amp;id=AxoiVUEvagkC&amp;amp;dq=grammatical+constructions+boas&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=m59TR0U-tz&amp;amp;sig=V3RS-zr6Mg2lK3WqjOMvYUccW4E&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;Fuzzy Grammar&lt;/i&gt; includes excerpts that make a good case for fuzzy syntactic categories.&amp;nbsp; Also, it seems that Noam Chomsky himself suggested degrees of grammaticality even back in 1965.&amp;nbsp; The other book I&apos;m still working on.</description>
  <comments>http://trickybrains.livejournal.com/1606.html</comments>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>1</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
